<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 86 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the authenticity and validity of the Certificate of Origin for PVC Sheeting Flex Banner imported from Malaysia. The department failed to follow the required procedure under Rule 9 of the Customs Tariff Rules 2011, leading to the dismissal of their allegations that the goods were of Chinese origin. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper verification and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 86 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the authenticity and validity of the Certificate of Origin for PVC Sheeting Flex Banner imported from Malaysia. The department failed to follow the required procedure under Rule 9 of the Customs Tariff Rules 2011, leading to the dismissal of their allegations that the goods were of Chinese origin. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proper verification and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>