<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 5 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33858</link>
    <description>The court held that the term &#039;staple fibres&#039; in Notification No. 30/2004 applies to duty-paid inputs falling under Headings 55.01 to 55.04, not just Heading 55.03. Consequently, the petitioners were entitled to the exemption for tops manufactured from duty-paid inputs under Heading 55.01. The writ petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 5 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33858</link>
      <description>The court held that the term &#039;staple fibres&#039; in Notification No. 30/2004 applies to duty-paid inputs falling under Headings 55.01 to 55.04, not just Heading 55.03. Consequently, the petitioners were entitled to the exemption for tops manufactured from duty-paid inputs under Heading 55.01. The writ petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>