<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 61 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty against the appellants for allegedly trading in steel scrap without payment. It found the Revenue&#039;s case lacked substantial evidence and investigation to prove the violations, emphasizing the necessity of tangible evidence over presumptions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating the show cause notice and order were not legally sustainable, and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 07:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 61 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty against the appellants for allegedly trading in steel scrap without payment. It found the Revenue&#039;s case lacked substantial evidence and investigation to prove the violations, emphasizing the necessity of tangible evidence over presumptions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating the show cause notice and order were not legally sustainable, and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>