https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309419 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect was insignificant, and dismissed the appeal on that limited ground. The Court expressly left the substantive question of law undecided, keeping it open for future consideration. The disposition was therefore confined to the low-tax-effect basis and did not resolve the underlying legal issue raised in the appeal. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2023 22:30:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309419 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect was insignificant, and dismissed the appeal on that limited ground. The Court expressly left the substantive question of law undecided, keeping it open for future consideration. The disposition was therefore confined to the low-tax-effect basis and did not resolve the underlying legal issue raised in the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309419