https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309412 An appeal against a money decree did not abate merely because the appellants were adjudicated insolvents, since the Official Assignee's power to continue proceedings extends only to matters relating to the insolvent's property. A challenge to a money decree was treated as outside that scope, even if it may indirectly affect the estate. Separately, the Court found no ground to interfere with the summary decree because summons for judgment had been served, no timely leave to defend was sought, and no credible defence to the promissory notes was shown. The challenge to the decree therefore failed and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:22:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309412 An appeal against a money decree did not abate merely because the appellants were adjudicated insolvents, since the Official Assignee's power to continue proceedings extends only to matters relating to the insolvent's property. A challenge to a money decree was treated as outside that scope, even if it may indirectly affect the estate. Separately, the Court found no ground to interfere with the summary decree because summons for judgment had been served, no timely leave to defend was sought, and no credible defence to the promissory notes was shown. The challenge to the decree therefore failed and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309412