<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309411</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and order. The Court emphasized that the Bank must honor its commitment under the bank guarantee independently of the underlying contract terms, barring any fraud or special equities. The appeal was allowed with costs, and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309411</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and order. The Court emphasized that the Bank must honor its commitment under the bank guarantee independently of the underlying contract terms, barring any fraud or special equities. The appeal was allowed with costs, and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>