<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442417</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal due to technical filing issues. Technical glitches preventing electronic filing and subsequent manual appeal submission were deemed valid grounds for appeal reinstatement. The court directed the respondent to process the appeal on merits, emphasizing procedural fairness and considering a subsequent government notification allowing manual filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442417</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal due to technical filing issues. Technical glitches preventing electronic filing and subsequent manual appeal submission were deemed valid grounds for appeal reinstatement. The court directed the respondent to process the appeal on merits, emphasizing procedural fairness and considering a subsequent government notification allowing manual filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>