<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33846</link>
    <description>A service tax demand based solely on an accounting entry describing receipts as &quot;Management Fee&quot; was held unsustainable because the department did not reliably establish that management consultancy service had actually been rendered or correctly classified. The assessee&#039;s explanation that any activity, if proved, would fall under Business Auxiliary Service introduced from 1 July 2003 was not effectively rebutted. On that evidentiary record, the demand failed and the consequential interest and penalties were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33846</link>
      <description>A service tax demand based solely on an accounting entry describing receipts as &quot;Management Fee&quot; was held unsustainable because the department did not reliably establish that management consultancy service had actually been rendered or correctly classified. The assessee&#039;s explanation that any activity, if proved, would fall under Business Auxiliary Service introduced from 1 July 2003 was not effectively rebutted. On that evidentiary record, the demand failed and the consequential interest and penalties were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>