<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33845</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi remanded the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to the non-consideration of evidence presented by the Advocate. The appellants were instructed to provide the evidence for a new decision, resulting in the appeal being allowed through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33845</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi remanded the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to the non-consideration of evidence presented by the Advocate. The appellants were instructed to provide the evidence for a new decision, resulting in the appeal being allowed through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>