<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 291 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33844</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the denial of Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 64,994/- due to the appellant taking credit beyond six months of the date of the relevant invoice, as stipulated by Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and time limits for claiming Modvat credit, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 291 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33844</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the denial of Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 64,994/- due to the appellant taking credit beyond six months of the date of the relevant invoice, as stipulated by Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and time limits for claiming Modvat credit, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>