<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1437 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309407</link>
    <description>Where the principal noticee has obtained a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 in full and final settlement of the tax dues, penalty proceedings against a co-noticee for the same matter do not survive. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that continuing a penalty claim against an accountant who was only a co-noticee would defeat the object of the Scheme. The penalty was therefore set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 18:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1437 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309407</link>
      <description>Where the principal noticee has obtained a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 in full and final settlement of the tax dues, penalty proceedings against a co-noticee for the same matter do not survive. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that continuing a penalty claim against an accountant who was only a co-noticee would defeat the object of the Scheme. The penalty was therefore set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>