<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1355 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442376</link>
    <description>HC found violation of natural justice in tax order under Section 129(3) of CGST Act. Impugned order was set aside due to lack of proper hearing opportunity. Matter remanded for fresh consideration, directing respondent to review case within six weeks, providing petitioner a fair chance to present arguments, without refunding previously paid amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1355 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442376</link>
      <description>HC found violation of natural justice in tax order under Section 129(3) of CGST Act. Impugned order was set aside due to lack of proper hearing opportunity. Matter remanded for fresh consideration, directing respondent to review case within six weeks, providing petitioner a fair chance to present arguments, without refunding previously paid amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>