<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 97 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33838</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the assessee based on the interpretation of section 43B and the applicability of the first proviso. The conflict between the Division Bench judgments and the Supreme Court decision played a crucial role in shaping the outcome of the case, with the High Court following the binding nature of the apex court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 97 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33838</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the assessee based on the interpretation of section 43B and the applicability of the first proviso. The conflict between the Division Bench judgments and the Supreme Court decision played a crucial role in shaping the outcome of the case, with the High Court following the binding nature of the apex court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>