<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1343 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442364</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC allowed revenue&#039;s appeal following SC precedent in Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia case. Court held that Section 153C amendments under Finance Act 2015 apply retrospectively to searches conducted before 01.06.2015. The assessee&#039;s argument that seized documents lacked handwriting or address references was rejected. HC quashed tribunal&#039;s order dated 23.11.2022 and remanded matter to CIT(Appeals) for decision on merits, ruling in favor of revenue department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1343 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442364</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC allowed revenue&#039;s appeal following SC precedent in Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia case. Court held that Section 153C amendments under Finance Act 2015 apply retrospectively to searches conducted before 01.06.2015. The assessee&#039;s argument that seized documents lacked handwriting or address references was rejected. HC quashed tribunal&#039;s order dated 23.11.2022 and remanded matter to CIT(Appeals) for decision on merits, ruling in favor of revenue department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>