<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442362</link>
    <description>The Court directed a fresh inquiry in a writ petition challenging orders under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, noting discrepancies in the respondent&#039;s argument and instructing the petitioner to provide complete details within six weeks for final adjudication. The impugned orders were set aside due to inadequacy of details provided by the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of full compliance and accurate information for tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442362</link>
      <description>The Court directed a fresh inquiry in a writ petition challenging orders under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, noting discrepancies in the respondent&#039;s argument and instructing the petitioner to provide complete details within six weeks for final adjudication. The impugned orders were set aside due to inadequacy of details provided by the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of full compliance and accurate information for tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>