<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1337 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the ld. PCIT erred in assuming jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be after full enquiry and not falling within the specified clauses. Consequently, the order by the ld. PCIT was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1337 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the ld. PCIT erred in assuming jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be after full enquiry and not falling within the specified clauses. Consequently, the order by the ld. PCIT was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>