<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1324 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442345</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by a shareholder and former Director against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal (Insolvency). The first appeal challenged a finding of trespassing on a property claimed as personal, not corporate debtor&#039;s. The second appeal involved non-cooperation with the Resolution Professional and treatment of personal property as corporate assets. The Appellant&#039;s failure to cooperate and produce necessary documents led to dismissal, emphasizing the duty of ex-directors to assist in insolvency processes. The Tribunal upheld the original orders, stressing the importance of cooperation for successful liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1324 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442345</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by a shareholder and former Director against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal (Insolvency). The first appeal challenged a finding of trespassing on a property claimed as personal, not corporate debtor&#039;s. The second appeal involved non-cooperation with the Resolution Professional and treatment of personal property as corporate assets. The Appellant&#039;s failure to cooperate and produce necessary documents led to dismissal, emphasizing the duty of ex-directors to assist in insolvency processes. The Tribunal upheld the original orders, stressing the importance of cooperation for successful liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>