<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 145 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33827</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original alleging evasion of Service Tax on Technical Inspection and Certification Services. The appellants argued that software testing should not be taxed under this category, citing a previous decision. The Bench agreed, noting software testing&#039;s integral role in software development and the specific inclusion of &#039;testing and analysis of IT Software&#039; under a different category post-amendments. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, based on the interpretation of software testing as distinct from Technical Inspection and Certification Services and legislative changes brought about by the Finance Act, 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 145 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33827</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original alleging evasion of Service Tax on Technical Inspection and Certification Services. The appellants argued that software testing should not be taxed under this category, citing a previous decision. The Bench agreed, noting software testing&#039;s integral role in software development and the specific inclusion of &#039;testing and analysis of IT Software&#039; under a different category post-amendments. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, based on the interpretation of software testing as distinct from Technical Inspection and Certification Services and legislative changes brought about by the Finance Act, 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>