https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11793 The petitioner failed to update its change of principal place of business on the GST portal; inspection found the old premises abandoned and the revenue issued a notice under section 29(2)(e) for cancellation of registration. The adjudicating authority rejected the petitioner's reply and cancelled registration. The High Court held that non intimation of address and non cooperation with proceedings meant the notice was not non speaking and that these defaults made the case unfit for relief under Article 226. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:41:06 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:41:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11793 The petitioner failed to update its change of principal place of business on the GST portal; inspection found the old premises abandoned and the revenue issued a notice under section 29(2)(e) for cancellation of registration. The adjudicating authority rejected the petitioner's reply and cancelled registration. The High Court held that non intimation of address and non cooperation with proceedings meant the notice was not non speaking and that these defaults made the case unfit for relief under Article 226. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:41:06 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11793