<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1291 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442312</link>
    <description>An unregistered agreement to sell, coupled with possession for interior works, did not create ownership rights or a security interest, so the property remained part of the liquidation estate. The Tribunal held that exclusion from liquidation requires a legally recognised encumbrance or conveyance, and that compulsory registration is necessary for transfer of immovable property of the relevant value. The plea based on part performance could not override the absence of a registered sale deed in the insolvency context. The appellants were therefore not entitled to exclude the property from the liquidation estate or to compel registration of title in their favour, and the dismissal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1291 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442312</link>
      <description>An unregistered agreement to sell, coupled with possession for interior works, did not create ownership rights or a security interest, so the property remained part of the liquidation estate. The Tribunal held that exclusion from liquidation requires a legally recognised encumbrance or conveyance, and that compulsory registration is necessary for transfer of immovable property of the relevant value. The plea based on part performance could not override the absence of a registered sale deed in the insolvency context. The appellants were therefore not entitled to exclude the property from the liquidation estate or to compel registration of title in their favour, and the dismissal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>