<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1281 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442302</link>
    <description>The Stay Application was dismissed due to the assessee&#039;s lack of interest in prosecuting the matter, leading to its deemed meritless dismissal. The addition of unexplained money under sec. 69A r.w.s. 115BBE and violation of sec. 40A(3) provisions were upheld by the Tribunal, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence and explanations, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PANAJI pronounced the order openly on 25th August, 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1281 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442302</link>
      <description>The Stay Application was dismissed due to the assessee&#039;s lack of interest in prosecuting the matter, leading to its deemed meritless dismissal. The addition of unexplained money under sec. 69A r.w.s. 115BBE and violation of sec. 40A(3) provisions were upheld by the Tribunal, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence and explanations, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PANAJI pronounced the order openly on 25th August, 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>