<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1277 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the assessee. It directed the Assessing Officer to compute capital gain separately for land and building, allowing indexation on the cost of acquisition and improvement. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that the claim for long term capital gain should be allowed based on a similar claim accepted in a related case involving a co-owner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1277 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the assessee. It directed the Assessing Officer to compute capital gain separately for land and building, allowing indexation on the cost of acquisition and improvement. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that the claim for long term capital gain should be allowed based on a similar claim accepted in a related case involving a co-owner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>