<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 170 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Leo Travels Pvt. Ltd., in a case involving short-paid service tax under &#039;Air Travel Agents.&#039; The Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance penalties was overturned as it contravened Section 84(4) by passing orders while an appeal was pending. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and legal restrictions on penalty revisions, setting aside the penalty enhancements and upholding the appeal against revised penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 170 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Leo Travels Pvt. Ltd., in a case involving short-paid service tax under &#039;Air Travel Agents.&#039; The Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance penalties was overturned as it contravened Section 84(4) by passing orders while an appeal was pending. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and legal restrictions on penalty revisions, setting aside the penalty enhancements and upholding the appeal against revised penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>