https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808 The Tribunal declined to grant an interim stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, finding no sufficient basis for stay at the interlocutory stage despite contested legal issues and revenue implications. It instead ordered expeditious disposal by listing the Revenue's appeals for early hearing. On the refund aspect, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had voluntarily paid service tax and had sought the benefit of notifications later disputed by the Revenue, but it did not decide refund entitlement pending final hearing. The assessee undertook not to press the refund claim until the appeals are finally decided, and that undertaking was accepted. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808 The Tribunal declined to grant an interim stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, finding no sufficient basis for stay at the interlocutory stage despite contested legal issues and revenue implications. It instead ordered expeditious disposal by listing the Revenue's appeals for early hearing. On the refund aspect, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had voluntarily paid service tax and had sought the benefit of notifications later disputed by the Revenue, but it did not decide refund entitlement pending final hearing. The assessee undertook not to press the refund claim until the appeals are finally decided, and that undertaking was accepted. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808