https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's stay applications against the Commissioner's Orders-in-Appeal, emphasizing the need for early resolution due to financial impact and conflicting positions. An early hearing was ordered on 25th February 2009, with the appellant agreeing not to press for a refund until the appeals were disposed of, leading to rejection of the stay applications. The Tribunal aimed for a prompt resolution, maintaining the status quo on the refund of taxes paid by the appellant. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's stay applications against the Commissioner's Orders-in-Appeal, emphasizing the need for early resolution due to financial impact and conflicting positions. An early hearing was ordered on 25th February 2009, with the appellant agreeing not to press for a refund until the appeals were disposed of, leading to rejection of the stay applications. The Tribunal aimed for a prompt resolution, maintaining the status quo on the refund of taxes paid by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33808