https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33806 A request for a further direction to implement an earlier Tribunal order and resume re-adjudication was rejected because the applicant had not strictly complied with the prior direction to produce evidence within time. The Tribunal also noted the absence of proof that effective steps had been taken to secure disposal of the writ petition pending before the High Court. In those circumstances, it found no deliberate disobedience on the part of the Assistant Commissioner in waiting for the writ matter to conclude, and considered the concern of judicial discipline relevant. The authorities relied on by the applicant were distinguished on their facts, so the application was not entertained. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33806 A request for a further direction to implement an earlier Tribunal order and resume re-adjudication was rejected because the applicant had not strictly complied with the prior direction to produce evidence within time. The Tribunal also noted the absence of proof that effective steps had been taken to secure disposal of the writ petition pending before the High Court. In those circumstances, it found no deliberate disobedience on the part of the Assistant Commissioner in waiting for the writ matter to conclude, and considered the concern of judicial discipline relevant. The authorities relied on by the applicant were distinguished on their facts, so the application was not entertained. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33806