<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 284 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consulting engineer, stating that reimbursable expenses should not be included in the assessable value for Service Tax. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and halted the recovery process. It was decided that there would be no recovery even after 180 days. The appeal was scheduled for an expedited hearing on 29th October 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 284 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consulting engineer, stating that reimbursable expenses should not be included in the assessable value for Service Tax. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and halted the recovery process. It was decided that there would be no recovery even after 180 days. The appeal was scheduled for an expedited hearing on 29th October 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>