<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 277 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33780</link>
    <description>An appeal rejected for non-filing of a waiver or stay application and for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was set aside, as the omission was treated as inadvertent and the respondent did not oppose remand. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) with liberty to file a fresh stay petition, enabling consideration of the request for waiver before the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 277 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33780</link>
      <description>An appeal rejected for non-filing of a waiver or stay application and for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was set aside, as the omission was treated as inadvertent and the respondent did not oppose remand. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) with liberty to file a fresh stay petition, enabling consideration of the request for waiver before the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>