<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 140 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33769</link>
    <description>The tribunal modified the initial order, dispensing with the requirement of depositing a partial amount, as the issue of classifying laying down a water pipeline under &quot;Commercial and Industrial services&quot; for service tax purposes had been settled by previous tribunal decisions and court judgments. The appellants successfully argued based on legal precedents, leading to the modification of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 140 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33769</link>
      <description>The tribunal modified the initial order, dispensing with the requirement of depositing a partial amount, as the issue of classifying laying down a water pipeline under &quot;Commercial and Industrial services&quot; for service tax purposes had been settled by previous tribunal decisions and court judgments. The appellants successfully argued based on legal precedents, leading to the modification of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>