<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442284</link>
    <description>Whether Section 67(2) CGST empowers seizure of currency: Applying purposive interpretation and following the HC precedent, the court held that the powers under Section 67 do not extend to seizure of assets merely because they are not accounted for; such interpretation bars treating unaccounted currency as liable to seizure under that provision. Outcome: The respondent was directed to remit the seized amount to the petitioner&#039;s bank account with accrued interest within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442284</link>
      <description>Whether Section 67(2) CGST empowers seizure of currency: Applying purposive interpretation and following the HC precedent, the court held that the powers under Section 67 do not extend to seizure of assets merely because they are not accounted for; such interpretation bars treating unaccounted currency as liable to seizure under that provision. Outcome: The respondent was directed to remit the seized amount to the petitioner&#039;s bank account with accrued interest within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>