<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1258 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order. The decision emphasized the significance of proper notice service and procedural compliance in penalty proceedings, finding merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding jurisdictional issues and service of notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1258 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order. The decision emphasized the significance of proper notice service and procedural compliance in penalty proceedings, finding merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding jurisdictional issues and service of notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>