<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PCIT&#039;s Use of Section 263 Explanation 2 Challenged: Limits on Revisional Authority Over Prior AO Decisions Examined.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71710</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - Regarding introduction of Explanation 2 to section 263, as claimed by Ld. PCIT in his order, we only need to submit that the said Explanation does not give unfettered power to the PCIT to assume revisional-jurisdiction to revise every order of the AO to re-examine the issues already examined during assessment-proceeding. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:18:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PCIT&#039;s Use of Section 263 Explanation 2 Challenged: Limits on Revisional Authority Over Prior AO Decisions Examined.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71710</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - Regarding introduction of Explanation 2 to section 263, as claimed by Ld. PCIT in his order, we only need to submit that the said Explanation does not give unfettered power to the PCIT to assume revisional-jurisdiction to revise every order of the AO to re-examine the issues already examined during assessment-proceeding. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:18:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>