<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rectification order u/s 154 was time-barred as it should have been issued within four years from the original assessment order, not from the order giving effect to the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Relying on the decision in CIT v. Sakseria Cotton Mills Ltd., the Tribunal deemed the rectification order invalid as it exceeded the limitation period. Consequently, the rectification order dated 29.06.2017 was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rectification order u/s 154 was time-barred as it should have been issued within four years from the original assessment order, not from the order giving effect to the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Relying on the decision in CIT v. Sakseria Cotton Mills Ltd., the Tribunal deemed the rectification order invalid as it exceeded the limitation period. Consequently, the rectification order dated 29.06.2017 was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>