https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249 Specific allegations that the accused was in charge of a partnership firm and responsible for its affairs, coupled with dishonoured cheques issued towards rent liability, were sufficient to resist quashing at the initial stage. A claimed retirement deed and related public notice were not unimpeachable or incontrovertible material, so their genuineness and effect had to be tested at trial rather than under inherent jurisdiction. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the complaints and summoning order, and the proceedings were restored for trial. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:17:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249 Specific allegations that the accused was in charge of a partnership firm and responsible for its affairs, coupled with dishonoured cheques issued towards rent liability, were sufficient to resist quashing at the initial stage. A claimed retirement deed and related public notice were not unimpeachable or incontrovertible material, so their genuineness and effect had to be tested at trial rather than under inherent jurisdiction. The High Court was therefore not justified in quashing the complaints and summoning order, and the proceedings were restored for trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249