https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court of Meghalaya's decision to quash criminal complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act and related IPC sections due to insufficient evidence. The Court ruled that the validity of the Retirement Deed and its impact on liability should be determined during trial and not in quashing proceedings. Emphasizing the need for concrete evidence, the Supreme Court reinstated the complaints against respondent no.1 for trial, overturning the High Court's order. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:17:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court of Meghalaya's decision to quash criminal complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act and related IPC sections due to insufficient evidence. The Court ruled that the validity of the Retirement Deed and its impact on liability should be determined during trial and not in quashing proceedings. Emphasizing the need for concrete evidence, the Supreme Court reinstated the complaints against respondent no.1 for trial, overturning the High Court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442249