https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442246 The court affirmed the conviction and sentence under sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, directing the petitioners to pay compensation or face imprisonment. It rejected arguments of professional negligence, upheld the validity of cheques issued as security for professional fees, and determined the complaint was filed within the limitation period. The petitioners' revisional application was dismissed, and they were ordered to comply with the sentence within a month. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Aug 2023 21:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442246 The court affirmed the conviction and sentence under sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, directing the petitioners to pay compensation or face imprisonment. It rejected arguments of professional negligence, upheld the validity of cheques issued as security for professional fees, and determined the complaint was filed within the limitation period. The petitioners' revisional application was dismissed, and they were ordered to comply with the sentence within a month. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442246