https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442244 A decree embodying an agreement of sale was held not to fall within the prohibition in Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, because an agreement for sale does not itself create an interest in immovable property and a decree for specific performance does not alter that position. The court also held that Section 29(2) governed registration of the copy of a decree, so registration was not confined to the sub-district where the property was situated; presentation at the office where the decree was made was proper, and registration could be effected in the manner permitted by that provision. Pending collateral writ proceedings concerning patta did not justify refusal of registration, and the objections failed. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2023 08:16:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442244 A decree embodying an agreement of sale was held not to fall within the prohibition in Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, because an agreement for sale does not itself create an interest in immovable property and a decree for specific performance does not alter that position. The court also held that Section 29(2) governed registration of the copy of a decree, so registration was not confined to the sub-district where the property was situated; presentation at the office where the decree was made was proper, and registration could be effected in the manner permitted by that provision. Pending collateral writ proceedings concerning patta did not justify refusal of registration, and the objections failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442244