https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to convict the appellant under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for deceiving depositors. The appellant's appeal contending contradictory charges and lack of proof of dishonest intention was dismissed, emphasizing the narrow scope of revision in criminal cases. Additionally, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's order for the sentences to run concurrently, citing judicial discretion under Section 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code and emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of such discretion based on the nature of offenses and case circumstances. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to convict the appellant under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for deceiving depositors. The appellant's appeal contending contradictory charges and lack of proof of dishonest intention was dismissed, emphasizing the narrow scope of revision in criminal cases. Additionally, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's order for the sentences to run concurrently, citing judicial discretion under Section 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code and emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of such discretion based on the nature of offenses and case circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359