https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC is narrow and is meant to correct patent defect, jurisdictional error, or legal impropriety, not to reappreciate evidence as in a regular appeal. Concurrent findings of conviction are not to be interfered with unless they are perverse or affected by a clear error of law or procedure, so the conviction was left undisturbed. The power under Section 31 CrPC to direct sentences for offences at the same trial to run concurrently is discretionary and must be exercised judicially on the facts and nature of the offences; the concurrent sentence direction was upheld. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359 Revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC is narrow and is meant to correct patent defect, jurisdictional error, or legal impropriety, not to reappreciate evidence as in a regular appeal. Concurrent findings of conviction are not to be interfered with unless they are perverse or affected by a clear error of law or procedure, so the conviction was left undisturbed. The power under Section 31 CrPC to direct sentences for offences at the same trial to run concurrently is discretionary and must be exercised judicially on the facts and nature of the offences; the concurrent sentence direction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309359