<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309361</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the case back to the Appellate Authority due to discrepancies in dropping charges. The Appellate Authority was directed to reconsider the appeal, focusing on specific charges for punishment within 3 months. The High Court emphasized limited judicial review scope and adherence to natural justice principles. The writ petition was disposed of without costs awarded, instructing parties to act on the judgment copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 11:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309361</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the case back to the Appellate Authority due to discrepancies in dropping charges. The Appellate Authority was directed to reconsider the appeal, focusing on specific charges for punishment within 3 months. The High Court emphasized limited judicial review scope and adherence to natural justice principles. The writ petition was disposed of without costs awarded, instructing parties to act on the judgment copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>