<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Criticizes 13-Year Delay in Adjudicating Show Cause Notice, Stresses Timely Resolution u/s 73.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71670</link>
    <description>Non-adjudication of show cause notice issued 13 years back - Even in absence of the provisions of sub-section (4) (B) of Section 73, respondent no. 2 could not have acted oblivious to the settled principle of law, that a show cause notice would be required to be adjudicated within a reasonable time depending the facts of each case. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:30:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Criticizes 13-Year Delay in Adjudicating Show Cause Notice, Stresses Timely Resolution u/s 73.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71670</link>
      <description>Non-adjudication of show cause notice issued 13 years back - Even in absence of the provisions of sub-section (4) (B) of Section 73, respondent no. 2 could not have acted oblivious to the settled principle of law, that a show cause notice would be required to be adjudicated within a reasonable time depending the facts of each case. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:30:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>