<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ADJUDICATION ON LAPSED SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER CUSTOMS ACT, 1962</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11781</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a show cause notice had lapsed where the proper officer failed to determine the amount of duty within the prescribed period under the unamended limitation regime; statutory timelines require determination unless it was demonstrably impossible, and unexplained departmental delay or repeated adjournments do not justify extension, so the impugned notice could not be adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:24:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:24:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ADJUDICATION ON LAPSED SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER CUSTOMS ACT, 1962</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11781</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a show cause notice had lapsed where the proper officer failed to determine the amount of duty within the prescribed period under the unamended limitation regime; statutory timelines require determination unless it was demonstrably impossible, and unexplained departmental delay or repeated adjournments do not justify extension, so the impugned notice could not be adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:24:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>