https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442236 HP HC held that a petition under Article 227 was maintainable despite non-constitution of appellate tribunal under Section 109 of the Act. The court rejected the Additional Advocate General's argument that the petition was not maintainable, ruling that petitioner had no alternative remedy since the appellate tribunal was yet to be constituted. Following the principle that no person can be rendered remediless and citing precedent from Bombay HC in similar circumstances, the court exercised supervisory jurisdiction over quasi-judicial authorities. The petition was allowed with merit. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442236 HP HC held that a petition under Article 227 was maintainable despite non-constitution of appellate tribunal under Section 109 of the Act. The court rejected the Additional Advocate General's argument that the petition was not maintainable, ruling that petitioner had no alternative remedy since the appellate tribunal was yet to be constituted. Following the principle that no person can be rendered remediless and citing precedent from Bombay HC in similar circumstances, the court exercised supervisory jurisdiction over quasi-judicial authorities. The petition was allowed with merit. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442236