<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1210 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442231</link>
    <description>HC quashed the Demand cum Show cause Notice issued by Principal Commissioner of GST &amp;amp; CX. The court found the notice invalid, considering the respondents&#039; decision not to file an SLP against a previous judgment. The petitioner successfully challenged the notice&#039;s legality, particularly regarding the extended period of limitation for service tax recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1210 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442231</link>
      <description>HC quashed the Demand cum Show cause Notice issued by Principal Commissioner of GST &amp;amp; CX. The court found the notice invalid, considering the respondents&#039; decision not to file an SLP against a previous judgment. The petitioner successfully challenged the notice&#039;s legality, particularly regarding the extended period of limitation for service tax recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>