https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33750 The Tribunal condoned a 30-day delay in filing the appeal after finding sufficient cause shown on the record. It then refused to stay the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on mobile telephone service, noting that the respondents had produced evidence showing use of the telephone in relation to the bills. As the demand had already been overturned in appeal and no sufficient basis for interim suspension was made out, the stay application was rejected. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33750 The Tribunal condoned a 30-day delay in filing the appeal after finding sufficient cause shown on the record. It then refused to stay the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on mobile telephone service, noting that the respondents had produced evidence showing use of the telephone in relation to the bills. As the demand had already been overturned in appeal and no sufficient basis for interim suspension was made out, the stay application was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33750