<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was not in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax at source under sections 194J and 195. It concluded that payments to member companies, resident and non-resident secondees, and foreign agents were not subject to TDS. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was not in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax at source under sections 194J and 195. It concluded that payments to member companies, resident and non-resident secondees, and foreign agents were not subject to TDS. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>