https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442189 The Tribunal's order could not stand where the appellant had not been heard and had also remained unrepresented on earlier hearing dates, because the absence of participation deprived the adjudication of the appellant's submissions against the Customs case and affected fairness. The proper course was to give both sides an opportunity to be heard and allow further submissions and documents before the Tribunal. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration after fresh hearing. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442189 The Tribunal's order could not stand where the appellant had not been heard and had also remained unrepresented on earlier hearing dates, because the absence of participation deprived the adjudication of the appellant's submissions against the Customs case and affected fairness. The proper course was to give both sides an opportunity to be heard and allow further submissions and documents before the Tribunal. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration after fresh hearing. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442189