<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest on delayed refund at the notified rate of 6%, rejecting the appellant&#039;s request for a higher rate of 9%. The appellant&#039;s argument for financial constraints due to incorrect classification and borrowing at high interest rates was not deemed sufficient to warrant an enhanced interest rate. The Tribunal emphasized that the delay of 253 days did not meet the threshold for granting a higher rate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1160 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest on delayed refund at the notified rate of 6%, rejecting the appellant&#039;s request for a higher rate of 9%. The appellant&#039;s argument for financial constraints due to incorrect classification and borrowing at high interest rates was not deemed sufficient to warrant an enhanced interest rate. The Tribunal emphasized that the delay of 253 days did not meet the threshold for granting a higher rate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>