<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1141 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442162</link>
    <description>Concurrent findings that Central Excise exemption Notification No. 4/2006 did not apply to the assessee were upheld, as the SC found no compelling reason to interfere in appellate review. The Court accepted that the authorities below had reached consistent findings on the notification&#039;s applicability and declined to disturb those conclusions. The exemption claim therefore failed, and the appeals were dismissed. Parties were left to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1141 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442162</link>
      <description>Concurrent findings that Central Excise exemption Notification No. 4/2006 did not apply to the assessee were upheld, as the SC found no compelling reason to interfere in appellate review. The Court accepted that the authorities below had reached consistent findings on the notification&#039;s applicability and declined to disturb those conclusions. The exemption claim therefore failed, and the appeals were dismissed. Parties were left to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>