https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309339 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in Final Orders dated 10.10.2017 and 22.11.2017, setting aside the impugned orders and granting cenvat credit for services like Hotel Services/Mandap Keeper Services, Designing, and Script Writing Services. Relying on precedents and Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, the Tribunal held that the disputed services qualified as input services, overturning the lower authorities' decisions. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, following previous decisions permitting cenvat credit for similar services. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309339 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in Final Orders dated 10.10.2017 and 22.11.2017, setting aside the impugned orders and granting cenvat credit for services like Hotel Services/Mandap Keeper Services, Designing, and Script Writing Services. Relying on precedents and Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, the Tribunal held that the disputed services qualified as input services, overturning the lower authorities' decisions. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, following previous decisions permitting cenvat credit for similar services. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309339