<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the service tax demand against the appellant for failure to comply with Notification No. 12/2003-S.T., resulting in the imposition of interest and penalty under relevant provisions. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims and reference to previous court decisions, the lack of documentary proof and clean hands doctrine led to the rejection of their appeal. The Tribunal also denied the application for stay of the order, directing the appellants to deposit the dues due to their lack of bona fide conduct during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the service tax demand against the appellant for failure to comply with Notification No. 12/2003-S.T., resulting in the imposition of interest and penalty under relevant provisions. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims and reference to previous court decisions, the lack of documentary proof and clean hands doctrine led to the rejection of their appeal. The Tribunal also denied the application for stay of the order, directing the appellants to deposit the dues due to their lack of bona fide conduct during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>