https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33740 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the amendment to the Notification regarding the applicability of service tax on services provided by Chartered Accountants was not retrospective. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh hearing on merits, with no further pre-deposit required from the appellants. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to decide within a specified timeframe upon a partial pre-deposit made by the appellants. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33740 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the amendment to the Notification regarding the applicability of service tax on services provided by Chartered Accountants was not retrospective. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh hearing on merits, with no further pre-deposit required from the appellants. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to decide within a specified timeframe upon a partial pre-deposit made by the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33740