https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309332 The High Court of Bombay set aside the impugned order where respondent No.2 canceled DTA sale permission without notice or hearing to the petitioner. The Court directed respondent to hear the petitioner before making any decision regarding the permission within three months, issue a reasoned order, and communicate it to the petitioner. The decision would not impact ongoing proceedings. The Writ Petition was disposed of with these directions, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:44:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309332 The High Court of Bombay set aside the impugned order where respondent No.2 canceled DTA sale permission without notice or hearing to the petitioner. The Court directed respondent to hear the petitioner before making any decision regarding the permission within three months, issue a reasoned order, and communicate it to the petitioner. The decision would not impact ongoing proceedings. The Writ Petition was disposed of with these directions, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309332